Archives

In Support of Philippine Sovereignty

Update March 29, 2017. Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Commissioner Gwendolyn Pimentel Gana categorically said yesterday that there is no proof that it’s by the government. She says, (in GMA News video, starting at timer 0:40 until 1:06) “We have not actually found that it’s [an] institutionalized policy of government. There’s nothing like that that we’ve actually found. We’re looking at the individual cases. But what we have actually seen is that there are security forces (do they call them scalawags or what?) security forces really involved in the killings.” At last, somebody from the CHR has finally made known what we knew all along.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yhoxx05x9UQ

I voted for Duterte and Cayetano. I am very happy that I did so. I also voted for Leila de Lima — now I am terribly regretting that vote. However, at that time I did not yet know that she has betrayed the public trust. I did not know how drugs proliferated in the national prisons during her time as the Secretary of the Department of Justice. I did not know that the prisons were centers of drug trade during her time. I did not know that she sent the former President Gloria Arroyo to prison without solid evidences. Now Arroyo has been vindicated, cleared of the allegations. I did not know that Leila de Lima broke ethical codes as a public servant by committing adultery against the wife of her former driver-bodyguard (this item is important in our Constitution and in our culture; so it is both a legal and an ethical/moral issue, not to say a religious one, too, which is a big deal in the country that still adheres to ‘conservative/traditional’ Christianity). I did not know that prison inmates had to procure millions of pesos through drug deals because, according to verified testimonies heard at the Houses of Senate and Congress, she needed the funds for her election bid. These are authentic narratives, seen on public national television, and were done according to national legal governmental proceedings, by duly elected congresspeople and senators, and so they represent all the Filipinos. Unless all of them are idiots, especially the House and Committee(s) Leaders, then this set of narratives that are connected to Leila de Lima’s involvement with the drug industry are supported by evidences. Furthermore, Duterte had nothing to do with all these investigations because his branch of the government, the Executive, is entirely separate from the Legislative (where the two Houses under it work independently as well). But since the Legislators are not idiots (well, a few are, actually, like de Lima herself and Trillanes), then Leila de Lima’s being in prison is legitimate. Oh, yes, it wasn’t the Legislators who sent her to prison, it was the Judiciary branch of the government, on behalf of the the People of the Republic of the Philippines. This is democracy at work. She is being accused of crimes related to illegal drugs to the effect of “aiding and abetting its proliferation”, whatever the exact item is (I’m not a lawyer so I haven’t bothered with the tiny details). Her claim that she is a “political prisoner” is laughable, it’s all in her head, because she believes that Duterte is personally after her after she made the arrogant blunder of insulting him years ago (an old story, but she keeps it ‘fresh’ by using the alleged Davao-Death-Squad-boogeyman that she herself, “smart” as she thinks she is, could not elevate from its status of ‘urban legend’; yep, she ‘investigated’ it in connection to Duterte many many years ago but she had no results, and Duterte was just a paltry small-time mayor of a peripheral city in the ignored south of the country at that time).

Leila de Lima is not a political prisoner. She is a deranged delusional pitiful talented lawyer who depended on promises of glory that, if things go Aguirre’s way (the present Secretary of the Department of Justice), she will soon discover to be just a carrot at the end of the stick. Looks like she has been “sacrificed” by the invisible powers that be. This is the same shadowy movement that Leni Robredo is holding on to now. There’s nothing authentic about Robredo’s speech-video to the United Nations. It smacks of a soul-sold-to-the-nebulous-might-of-the-all-pwerful-out-there that she doesn’t even understand anything about. Poor poor vice-president. Trillanes I have already mentioned. Together with that Magdalo-Party impeachment item against Duterte, Trillanes is, as Abella described such acts, “scraping the bottom of the barrel.” It’s a pathetically desperate attempt.

Of course, if these delusional tactics succeed, along with the likes of Hontiveros, and sometimes Pangilinan and Drilon, then I’d say that this “shadowy-thing” that has had my country under its influence for a long time now, say, starting near the end of the Marcos administration, I’d say that it’s “powerful”, indeed. Imagine, we did not even know that Aquino caused the formation of the NPA. Goodness. Our school books did not know anything, and the professors who knew about it did not say anything. We’ve been duped. My beloved Philippines has been duped. We need to pray for truth to come out. No, not the “truth” that de Lima and Robredo are talking about (hahahahaha! I mean, really! In that video-speech that she made, it appears as if she has no idea at all about the vast improvements that the cabinet members have already accomplished!!! Does she even get out of her house and look around? haha!!) The TRUTH, which you will only get if you live in the Philippines and when you investigate all angles without bias. My Mom says the streets are safer now. My Mom does not lie about such things. And my Mom always listens to the Sunday sermon and she says the priests speak of supporting the government and its programs. My Mom does not lie about such things. (So, see, there is a positive relationship between Duterte and the church; meaning, something else was going on behind that rally by a few nuns and priests; I bet they didn’t do their homework well before going there.)

Now, you, whoever you are, if your believe only the statements of Leila de Lima and Leni Robredo and whoever else’s that echoes theirs, please go back to Journalism 101.

PEACE.

May God bless us all.

Advertisements

Happy New Year

heart

Let us keep on being hopeful this new year, and all days thereon.

 

happy

Let us hope for each other.

Let us pray for each other, wherever we are in the world.

I wish all your dreams fulfilled.

Amen.

heart

Congratulations, President Trump

❤ Peace ❤

… because the prevailing riots in the US as I write this worry me … There are people’s property being destroyed, children getting frightened, moms and dads in intense stress over the safety of the family, and most especially the frail elderly whose daily life are severely disrupted.

I checked out videos of individual reactions to the Trump win and they’re really properly described by the titles as “meltdown”. In one of these videos I heard a teen-age girl wail that originally she was strongly for Bernie Sanders and since he was counted out she transferred her allegiance and hopes to Clinton.

So it got me to thinking that, yep, even Bernie is going to get dragged into this blame for the tantrums of the “liberals”(I put that inside quotes because that word has been severely abused in the course of this election; it’s time that this word is either re-defined or replaced in this particular usage).

Because, well, Bernie did go out and campaigned for Clinton. Notwithstanding that the REAL reason why Bernie did so is not talked about at all, Bernie’s campaign-behavior did not negate the profuse findings that the Wikileaks published connected to this election. This is the reason why Jill Stein got more votes than when Bernie was still in the race. That is, when Bernie was counted out many did not heed his call to support Clinton but instead they pivoted to Stein, and this mainly because of the facts that Wikileaks verified. With that being said, it’s not as if Bernie tricked everyone into getting in line with what he was saying in the campaigns. Why he was even campaigning for a person with whom he was fighting against is itself a very big mystery to me, and for sure it’s not because he had no crucial reason to do so. And second point is that he had promptly come out and spoke clearly that he is willing to work within the new administration, doing the usual stuff that he had been concerned about since he got into public service decades ago. (Nope, he does not say that he now “supports” Trump but that he will continue to work for the vision that he has not let go; here:  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/opinion/bernie-sanders-where-the-democrats-go-from-here.html

and here:

 

Trump won the election fair and square. If the argument will be that the Trump team stole the election, whoa, then the government has to track back to the legal proceedings regarding how the DNC (Democratic Party, touted “liberal”) stole the primaries from Bernie Sanders. Besides, the GOP (Republican Party, touted “conservative”) does not even like Trump so it’s not a parallel argument.

A path towards calmness may be immediately effective if the DNC or Clinton to say outright, clearly and publicly, for their supporters to stop the ‘disbelief’, gather their wits about them, and face a Trump presidency with as much humanity as they had before this disappointment. The continuing riots speak of an unwillingness that in the first place disabled people from taking heed of what developing, related, and past issues (like as revealed by the Wikileaks; H. A. Goodman among many others talks of these in his YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDB5XReUyyqt-FTNdkzFN-A) were speaking about and what they meant as a whole, and the implication to the Clinton candidacy.

Here’s a blog post that talks about the “silence” of those who could stop the riots: http://daisyluther.com/obama-clinton-sanders-stop-riots-just-watch/

So it’s not as if Clinton is more pristine than Trump nor is it also the other way around. The fact is that an election just happened, the procedures were followed, and the final scores speak for Trump. If Clinton supporters want their voice heard then it doesn’t mean that the Trump supporters have to be silenced and Trump be disqualified. Human rights belong to both Trump and Clinton supporters and all voices deserve respect. Throwing tantrums because you did not get what you want is self-destructive. It’s unhealthy for everyone including those who are not involved (— and so how about their human rights, too?).

If these rioters are not simply “throwing tantrums” then they are being paid to do so. And if neither, then they are seriously in need of psychological or psychiatric help. Five days is too much for any normal tantrum. Besides, it’s not as if what you have is a dictatorship. The government has a check-and-balance system and Trump cannot simply do whatever he wants to do if it comes to that. Besides, I don’t believe that he’s that dense. He himself has a family to take care of and he’ll be thinking of his legacy now. All humans do that = we don’t want to simply disappear from the face of the earth without a “something of ours being left behind”. Being human means a resistance from annihilation both physically and abstractly. And, Trump, with such a title to live up to, would want to be spoken of kindly in the history books (or e-books!).

(Update. Nov. 14, 2016. It’s fear. The rallies are because of FEAR. Here, by Democracy Now!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xwX6sRZOnU). It’s because of the campaign rhetoric(s) thrown back and forth between the candidates and the parties and the media during the campaign. People have the right to be afraid and to express this fear. This fear has to be addressed soonest.)

To the Filipinos who are affected by the riots, I am praying for you and your community, the people you associate with everyday. May you all stay safe. I’m sorry that you’re disappointed if you voted for Clinton. In order to change the results either fraud has to be proven or the voting has to be done again, and it seems that neither process will produce a different result. The exit polls can help clear the picture >> here is the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html?_r=0

… and here’s a kid who didn’t vote nor is he a fan of Trump and he’s analyzing what just happened and he makes sense to me, aside from taking the gloom out of a very dark pre-winter day today:

 

… and here is a professional evaluation, from Democracy Now!

❤ Peace ❤

 

Por Dios Por Santo …

. ❤ . Please, beloved countrywo/man, I entreat you as one who has just woken up to my Filipino-ness and to my human-ness, to broaden your perspective and simply TRUST the president in his decisions regarding where he is taking us as a nation … No president has yet felt this much about us, for our collective sakes, for our posterity, for over-all peace among us and between us and other nations … do not be offended by the way he handles himself internationally … Let Duterte be Duterte, respect his humanity, trust his heart … he knows so so much about global movements, stuff that he has no more time to explain to us, time is running out, he has to do all that he is doing right now, right now, so just open your eyes, scour for legitimate news sources, and remain assured that we have a system in place where the president will not go over the bounds of morality, ethics and legality … and if you have a serious matter to impart to him in case you think he is wrong in some matter or another, then write to the government page or reach him through his publicized direct telephone numbers … he is the only president who has an open line to the public, we have been empowered to act as members of a democracy …

. ❤ .

Stay healthy. 🙂

I Support Duterte. Part 6.

. ❤ .

I’ve just decided that the world is free to condemn Duterte an ass.

However, for us who understand what’s happening, he’s our chance at making it good in this life ever since European Christianity destroyed our society until today (read about it here (pdf):  david-okazaki_colonial-mentality). That’s 500 long years. But whereas Europe has devalued Christianity, we to this day remain a God-fearing people, maybe all not religious but certainly with a very strong sense of the spiritual <<< this I have no doubt.

The other day an illegal-drug laboratory capable of producing 400 kilos in one day was discovered. The operators abandoned the building when Duterte won the election.

The world can call us a nation of idiots, that’s fine. We’ll just do what we think is right. Anyway, when Duterte talks publicly he actually means it for our consumption, ergo his complete array of colorful expressions — such contextual emphatic expressions that non-Filipinos will find difficult to understand — so that we finally begin to think for ourselves, be free from “colonial mentality” that is our bane.

We had been stupid as a people and now is our chance to make up.

The industrialized world does not know all this, how we have suffered all these centuries, so they have no right to meddle with how we solve our problems. Instead they should be asking us in what ways we need help, because we urgently need help. But Duterte will not sell our national soul just to get help. If we can educate ourselves to the truth within Duterte’s term, either before he retires or before he is assassinated, then we’d have a hope at stopping the oligarchs’ excesses and give more chances to our poorest folks to better their lives.

The world condemns Duterte just on the basis of his stupid stupid mouth but for us his mouth is the least of our problems. And if indeed he was a cold-bloodied killer then that’s his business before God. (How can his neighbors of/for decades love him if he violates human rights?) But right now he’s not being a cold-bloodied killer as a president. I understand what’s happening. As of now he has restored the power of the law in the land. He constantly lectures us in all of his speeches that we must abide by the law. We have hope now in witnessing the culture of impunity disappear among the elite moneyed class. These are little gods, out of the reach of law. These elite are the remnants of the colonizers. Duterte has made enemies among them simply because he won the election. (There are mga elitista, many of them, who work for the plight of the people, and they are not part of who I’m referring to. There are non-elitista who are biased against Duterte simply because they are embarrassed of his rough ways and they want to distance themselves from him — these are the ones who are slaves to colonial mentality and many of them are fans of Leila de Lima<– that’s link to a video where she hysterically defends herself in front of media, a very un-lawyer-ly and cowardly procedure, instead of facing her accusers at the parliamentary investigations.) 🙂

The police and the wo/men-at-arms have once more become honorable to the people’s eyes. They’re back with their dignity in their correct places because they are sure now that the law will not abandon them to the moneyed-powerful. My people have not felt more safe and more hopeful for a very long time. The 700,000 who voluntarily identified themselves to the police got scared of the power of the law by way of the police. This was what Duterte wanted to happen. The majority were identified, had their names put on record, and were released back to their homes. The rest of us who have not violated the law are not scared of anything at all.

When the world calls Duterte an ass it’s us the people who feel the pain and we are at a loss because the world is more quick to condemn that to find out what’s true. The only way to stop Duterte’s foul mouth is to simply not provoke him in the first place. If the world thinks we’re a stupid primitive bunch, then so be it. We are only trying to survive as humans with dignity.

Here is the Philippines’ foreign policy (DFA Secretary Perfecto Yasay privilege speech, UN General Assembly, Sept. 20-26, 2016). The Secretary of Foreign Affairs Pefecto Yasay, Jr. is a pastor’s kid, a lawyer and teacher in the U.S., and Duterte’s dormitory roommate while both were in law school. Watch and listen:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE7PT2ynTk4

—–> Here is a summary of that speech from the UN webpage, below. (Source: https://gadebate.un.org/en/71/philippines )

Statement Summary: PERFECTO R. YASAY, JR., Secretary for Foreign Affairs of the Philippines, said that after his country’s hard-fought and hard-won independence, it zealously valued and guarded its rights and liberties through democracy and a system of checks and balances.  Five months ago, the people had elected new President Rodrigo Roa Duterte with an unprecedented and resounding electoral mandate.  For far too long, the Philippines had been unable to fully advance due to corruption, worsening crime, and the prevalence of illegal drugs, and corruption had become the breeding ground for the illegal drug trade.  The Government was determined to eradicate illicit drugs and their manufacture, distribution and use.  The rule of law and strict adherence to due process fully governed the campaign against corruption and criminality.  Noting that the Government’s actions had grabbed national and international attention for all the wrong reasons, he urged everyone “to allow us to deal with our domestic challenges in order to achieve our national goals, without undue interference”.  Extrajudicial killings had no place in Philippine society, and the Government did not and would never empower its law enforcement agents to shoot-to-kill any individual suspected of drug crimes, though police had the right to defend themselves when their lives were threatened.

The goal of the Government was to “leave no one behind” in its development strides, he said.  The Philippines continued to enhance the delivery and quality of social services, including in health, education, food, water and housing.  As one of the most disaster-prone and vulnerable countries to the adverse effects of climate change, the Philippines reiterated its call for climate justice and the principle of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities in the implementation of obligations under the Paris Agreement.  The country remained committed to the rule of law and to peace, including the recent decision on the Arbitral Tribunal of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague with regard to the disputes in the South China Sea.  Noting the final and binding nature of the Arbitral Award, the Philippines reaffirmed its commitment to pursuing peaceful resolution to regional disputes.

Here’s another speech that Secretary Yasay gave on September 15 at the CSIS Southeast Asia Program (Center for Strategic and International Studies):  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1F1kgh7cbg

. ❤ . I pray that no evil intents interfere with the plans of the president and his cabinet for the nation. I pray that the cabinet officials and their staff stay motivated and creative in all their activities. I wish them all the best of health. I pray that the malicious elements in the senate and the house of representatives listen to their conscience, and change their hearts for the better. I pray that the elite who insist on being blind, up there in their white fanciful tower, come down and have their fancy shoes dirtied with farm manure so that they begin to see reality. I pray that the youth, the young ones who are in schools, study their lessons well and study some more beyond what their teachers could deliver to them because there’s much more truth out there that is not taught in our schools. I pray that all teachers and all of the religious and sacerdotal add to their duties the aim of eradicating “colonial mentality” from the nation’s collective consciousness. I pray for the complete healing of everyone who has decided to turn their backs on drug addiction, and start to be really happy. I pray that persons in government who used their positions for the purpose of enriching themselves stop at their tracks and start giving back to the people the money and goods that they have stolen from everyone. I pray that the person on the street, the ordinary everyday person, hold on to his/her God-given strength, continue to hope, continue to work hard and honestly, until our nation is collectively delivered from the constant threat of poverty. I pray that Filipinos all over the globe take care of their health, stay sane and reasonable, not be blinded by the power of money, and stay spiritually intact in the face of any form of discrimination and cold treatment. I pray that the foreigners in my country stay safe, healthy, happy, and appreciative of the people’s friendliness. And I pray that the little ones, the children, imitate the president’s sweet little daughter and not follow our Tatay or Lolo Digong in speaking bad words. 🙂

My dear president, my virtual teacher, our leader, our elder brother, our friend, please continue to be in good health, stay humble, stay grounded, don’t forget to pray everyday, don’t forget your children’s and grandchildren’s birthdays, stay strong-willed, stay sane and lucid, stay reasonable, stay “transparent”, and manage your stress so that it doesn’t affect your rational judgments. Stay compassionate and sensitive to the poorest among us. May God bless you, our nation, and all peoples of the world.

battle-of-bud-dajo-march-7-1906

Source of picture above:  http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/moro-insurgents-1906/

That was the picture that Duterte was referring to at the meeting with the ASEAN leaders. Here is an account of that meeting:  http://themaharlikan.info/world/duterte-showed-this-picture-in-front-of-asean-leaders-diplomats-to-obama/

…   and here is an account in relation to the picture when he was not yet a president: http://www.mindanews.com/top-stories/2005/10/the-bud-dajo-massacre-a-hundred-years-later-will-america-apologize-2/

…  and here below is a 2011 scholarly/academic study of that 1906 event

Hawkins, Michael C. “Managing a Massacre: Savagery, Civility, and Gender in Moro Province in the Wake of Bud Dajo.” Philippine studies 59, no. 1 (2011): 83-105. Read here (pdf): managing-a-massacre_michael-hawkins-2011

We are not a country of haters. Japan was not less cruel to us (that’s why my grandfather had bitter memories of such cruelty) but we have no problems with Japan anymore. My cousin even teaches English to school kids there and is now starting her own family there, too.

Stay well, everyone, and let’s try to be happy in whatever peaceful we can. It doesn’t need much to be happy (yeah, and here’s my recommended book on that topic: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28254.Stone_Age_Economics

🙂

<3.

I Support Duterte. Part 5.

Once I shouted “bullshit” to a bunch of kids. That was when I was only a little more than a kid myself, my control on my emotions not as good as expected of adults, and besides my country does not cater to a culture that prevents and frowns on the public display of emotions.

It was actually at a classroom of seventeen or eighteen year-olds, I think, and they have known since they were seven what was expected of them inside the classroom: order, hushed voices if any, and avoidance of chaos MOST ESPECIALLY when a class activity is being conducted. And especially when a person of academic authority is present. They violated the standards of decorum at all counts and I wasn’t able to hold my strong dismay over their lack of respectfulness. So there was silence all at once, they knew that they deserved the strong reproach, they were strongly reminded where the class stands with respect to misbehavior, and they didn’t do it again.

As little kids until adolescents we were taught and expected to stand up and greet a visitor in unison. When a teacher was at our classroom door everything stops in the classroom because we’d all stand up as one and say together, “Good morning, Mrs. Santos.”, or something like that. If we did not know the person’s name we’d say, “Good morning, visitor.” All public primary and secondary schools in the Philippines, and even the private ones, practice this. So when I went to college I felt awkward when we weren’t allowed to do that kind of greeting anymore. I felt that it was disrespectful. But it seems that “adult” education does not expect such standard of respectfulness anymore. I slowly learned to live with the awkwardness and adapted to the non-practice. However, all teachers that I met in campus always got a “good mornig, ma’am” or a “good afternoon, sir” from me and from most of the other students, too.

That was the only time, as far as I can remember, when I spoke a swear word in public. I would remember it because I do not speak swear words at all in the hearing of another person. Not even with my family. Not even with my closest friends. I hardly think with swear words except when I am aggravated and then I can let myself deal with the issue with swear words that are commensurate to the gravity of the disturbance created in me — but all this would be silently and mentally, where only I can hear them being spoken out in my brain. I only “swear to myself”, so to speak.

The complementary set-up to my no-spoken-swearing stand is that I also do not receive swear words from anyone, and that I would take it as a grave insult if anyone swears at me. At home this is easy because nobody speaks swear words in our house. The worst that we would concede to is “gaga” or “gago”, for female or male as the case may be, and this not straight out but instead we modify it to “gagagaga” or to “ogag” to soften the impact to our own ears AND ALL THIS NEVER TO ONE ANOTHER IN THE HOUSE BUT TO SOMEBODY ELSE OF WHOM WE MAY BE ABLE TO CRITICIZE AS SIMPLY A MATTER OF OPINION DUE TO THEIR MANIFESTED ACTIONS AND NEVER DUE TO GOSSIP, AND ABSOLUTELY NEVER TOWARDS A RELATIVE. “Gaga” and “gago” may be best translated as “stupid”. There are families who speak swear words freely to each other, I have friends who use swear words freely, and I have nothing against them. I understand the context of their usage and they don’t swear at me besides. I leave them be and we stay friends. I know many persons  who hold similar opinions to mine regarding this matter. There are also many families who are like mine.

However, as it stands now I could hear myself freely speak to my close friends (BUT NOT AT HOME!) this opinion: “Dipuga! Din ka pa kakita prisidente nga parihas sini?!!” This will elicit amused chukles all around because this signals a concession on my part on behalf of a strong conviction as evidenced in the emphatic use of a ‘dirty’ swear word.

Translated into English that will amount to: F**k! Where else can you get a president like this one?!!

Or, that swear word can also be Bu*s*it!

Dipuga is a mellower variant of yudep*ta or of the shorter dep*ta.  “Yudep*ta” is the short form of “iho de p*ta”. Those who speak Spanish can see it clearly that it is the adaptation of “hijo de p*ta”, which into English is the common expletive SOB. However, not everyone prefers the length of that expletive even when the end part is modified into “gun!”. Many would ordinarily use the faster-said f**k or b**ch. English speakers know that this expletive, SOB, does not say anything about one’s mother. The expletive is not directed to mothers. The expletive is just an expression that is commensurate to the degree that an emotion is felt. It, or any similar to it (like “damn”), may even be breathed out in times of pleasant surprises.

I do not buy the disdain of the elitists in my country towards the foul mouth of our president. That’s all BS and they can all go to he*l. They can go f**k themselves. If they do not like swear words then so do I. If they have a high standard of abhorrence against swear words then so does my family. They do not even know from what standpoint they are on in their attack against the president’s manner of speaking. If the son of a pastor, and a former pastor, and a friend of a pastor can work closely with our president then I have no problem with their willingness to do so. Their participation speaks volumes about the character of the real Duterte. (If you think that these principled persons surrounding him will condone what is being accused of him (read: “illegal executions”) then there is something wrong with your basis. The head of the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO), Atty. Acosta, can help you be clarified with this issue. )

Those who just keep on harping (without saying anything else analytical, informative, and substantial) that the president “behave himself” are a bunch of gaga and gago. The executive branch of government has a mountain-load of urgent matters to attend to and all they recommend is that the  president soaps out his mouth. These misguided elitists have opinions and preferences that are more blind than a bat. More than being blind they are navigating at a wrong course, and in this instance a bat’s non-sight is not a matter for criticism because bats zero in perfectly towards their aims even without sight.

These elitists in my country (I’m describing those who fit in the description; it does not mean ALL  ELITISTS; I concede that there are possibly many exceptions), those who are shoot-high-up-to-the-moon-proud about their prowess in manipulating the English language, they generally know nothing about real life and real poverty and real suffering. (They’re the kind who who have the skills to write in opinion columns of newspapers.) All they know is how to keep their faces smooth and white like porcelain and how to keep their car tires mud free. And how to keep smelling like flowers and cologne the entire day. And how to keep dirt from under their fingernails. They know nothing about having to skip a meal because there simply are no means to get one. If ever they’d skip a meal it would be because they wish to subtract from the fat that’s jiggling in their overfed bodies. Being fat is not the issue here: the picture in this context that I speak of points to the indiferrence to human suffering that’s surrounding these elitists.

Today I heard the president reiterating his purpose of keeping friendly relations with all nations, and this without any exception. We are a small nation and we cannot afford to pick fights with anybody, as the president also says so. If his speeches are, again and again, painted out of context and with colors that feature only one or two hues then the richness of his thoughts are wasted. When he gives speeches (this one that I heard today is for the Philippine Air Force at Villamor Air Base) he is like a professor who is giving a lecture on contemporary governance in the Philippine context against the perspective of recent history. His speeches are extemporaneous and are sourced from his own decades-long observations and conviction as a public servant, aside from being an academician himself. His speeches are for the purpose of putting forth the real picture, the more comprehensive picture, the bigger picture, that part of our national reality that does not get talked about in the mainstream media’s just-bits-and-pieces-commercialized-segments. Of course we can hardly demand more from mainstream media. They are running a business, after all. They have to figure out how to have lots of income.

Our president, for the most part of his speeches, is actually expressing his disagreement in his own authentic way of the so-called ‘educated’ Filipino’s lack of capacity to analyze deeper and wider the implications that their dearly held colonialistic views are continuing to disregard the real issues that are right there before their eyes. There is a severe lack of venues for discussing opinions beyond the simple and safe pat labelling. It is a kind of ‘education’ that has not kept up with the global movements and is continuing on its course of mis-educating the young ones. It is in fact preventing our youth from being empowered, keeping them relatively ignorant against the present global situation. If being modernized means having citizens who are capable of thinking out things for themselves and not to simply depend on cooked-up peddled views, then my country is far from modern. However, there are ‘modern’ nations that are suffering because big range media that started out as an institution for the people have digressed from their noble profession. If you are keeping up with the news then you know what this nation is.

Peace. Stay healthy. Thanks for thinking out with me. I wish you the best in life, in whatever area you wish blessings for. May He-Who-Blesses-All bless us all in His and our own good time.

 

Bernie-or-Bust. By a Non-voter.

. ❤ .

. ❤ .

I understand why this lady speaks this way. Ten minutes into the video I was already almost done with my introspective-analysis and I have seen another level of real-world “reality”. This was what Senator Sanders referred to. When the smoke clears, this phenomenon will be spoken of with more clarity. Nevertheless, I do agree with this lady saying that something is wrong; she has said it clearly.

However, I believe that Bernie knew what was going on while he was on the campaign trail. What happened was that he decided to take the fall, the most likely coming “fall”. He saw a very narrow window of possibility and he took the chance. He did so with all the knowledge that he acquired through years of being INSIDE the system. He KNOWS the system. He’s actually the one who made a crack at the glass ceiling, not Clinton. Being the first female candidate for president is no big deal and that’s the DNC’s biggest gloating point; that’s actually pathetic, in no matter what kind of system it is within, in the context of 21st century history world.

Bernie made a 2-pronged attack: tried to be president and at the same time rallied people to wake up to the massive corruption. He lost his other plan but succeeded in the other. Now that more and more people are becoming awake and willing to rally behind TRUTH then that accomplishment by itself is greater than becoming the POTUS.

With all this being said, had I been a voter would I vote for Clinton? No, I will not. That means if there weren’t enough like me who would vote for somebody else, and most likely Jill Stein, then that means Trump wins. The dilemma is this: either vote for a Machiavellian-liar-who-has-absolutely-no-idea-what-poverty-is-like or let a public-service-ignoramus-celebrity win. As I see that nature is governed by Chaos (the scientific phenomenon; it’s a regularity that is characterized by randomness at the smallest scale; you can look it up) then I would rather NOT VOTE for one who has been proven to have consistently lied (as Anderson Cooper had asked: “Would you say anything to get elected?”).

Doing so would allow Chaos to run its course. Letting LIFE be. Not forcefully altering the course of a mighty river. Not tying the Solar System to a single point in its whooshing orbit about the Milky Way. This means Trump may win. It may also be that Trump will not win. If Trump wins then America will be in uncertain executive governance (unless he lets the status-quo-big-money totally hold the reigns). This will be creating a violent shift in the equilibrium, and it will result into multi-directional repercussions so that the “fight” for “balance” is maintained. Unless those who think similarly to Bernie and Jill and the like exert a strong enough counter-balance. It’s an abstract description but that’s how nature works. This series or conglomeration of reactions will not be happening for only a single or two terms (in case he gets re-elected, good grief!) but it will reverberate until its direct effects die off.

Bernie knew that had he insisted on “grabbing power”, which would be a major major shift in the current system —- literally pulling the rug from under the status quo —- he would have risked a tremendous counter-effect WHICH will affect the little people much more than the crocodiles (sorry, in my country we call the insatiable-power-hungry-entities as buwaya, i. e., the crocodile). You ask me “how” and, well, I don’t have the economic and sociological tools to get into expounding this yet, but those who understand more can see that this description of mine makes sense (and there’s another possibility which I don’t want to mention here; either I am again correct in that possibility-point or it will show the extent of my idealist-naiveté, or both, which are equally fine by me because, indeed, I have no idea exactly the extent of visions that Bernie’s sight has reached).

So not electing Clinton is a gamble, for hope (that she does not win) or for forbearance until the tide turns (that a Trump presidency will either have only the minimum of damages or that it will taper off the soonest, and throughout that we remain intact). The flip side of it is that voting for Clinton means acknowledging that I have no choice but to silence and numb my soul and trust a deceitful system for the sake of urgent survival. In essence I would have annihilated myself — – the antithesis of LIFE.

It could be that Bernie Sanders has already gone to the level where he saw that, indeed, survival in America has exactly become like that:  to grip the knife’s cutting edges and not let go lest I fall and break my neck. In my country we call this phenomenon “Kapit sa patalim“.

Stay strong, Bernie. Stay healthy. Don’t exert too much effort for a deceitful system. Don’t invest too much on stuff that’s built on shifting fancy sand (of course you already know this! haha!). It’s time to let the grassroots see that, indeed, you have seen the enormity of what they have accomplished so far and that your “silence” did not mean that you had no idea how your perceived “non-communication” had hurt. Time to heal the wounds created by your “betrayal” (yep, that’s how it felt, and you know that, too), and time for your supporters to decide how much more, and for how long, are they willing to invest into TRUTH. ❤

Take care. everyone. Enjoy the sun! 🙂